Free food diary tool

Food-log quality checker

Check whether your diary has enough reviewed days, portions, source labels, calorie-to-macro consistency, and a clear question to support a useful conversation. This is diary-quality prep only, not a food score, diet plan, calorie prescription, or medical nutrition therapy.

Open the tool Browse all tools

Free, no accountSources on the pageNothing is stored

Tool rhythm

Use the tool, then carry forwardthe context that matters.

Each page turns a narrow question into clearer prep: what you entered, what is still missing, and what would be worth discussing with a licensed clinician.

Open the tool

In practice

Start with the numbers, notes, or checklist items you already have.
Treat the result as education and visit prep, not a medical decision.
Use the handoff when your own records can add useful context.

Interactive worksheet

Work the question here, then decide what to carry forward.

Each public tool keeps the input, result, source basis, and safety boundary in one place. When your own records matter, sign in and bring the context into Ojava Coach.

Food diary tool

Food-log quality checker

Reviewed food-log daysMeals with portionsMeals with timingMeals with source labelsMeals marked reviewedMeals with label, recipe, or restaurant contextMeals with calories and macrosMeals needing calorie and macro review

Goal contextQuestion to bring forward

90/100strong diary-quality readiness

Strong diary-quality readiness (90/100): enough reviewed detail exists for a better nutrition conversation.Diary quality and visit prep only, not diet advice.

Useful context

Consistency: 5 reviewed logged days
Portions and timing: 12 meals have portion or serving context
Calorie and macro review: 8 entries include calories plus protein, carbs, and fat
Source and review state: 9 meals keep a source label
Conversation context: Goal context: Understand weekday protein and late snack patterns

Missing context

Consistency: Add a full week if you want weekday and weekend context
Calorie and macro review: Review entries whose calories do not line up with protein, carbs, and fat

Questions to bring forward

Which logged meals are missing portions, timing, or source labels?
Which entries are estimates versus reviewed labels, recipes, restaurant data, or saved meals?
Which entries have calories that do not line up with protein, carbs, and fat?
What specific nutrition question should this diary help answer?
What context should stay with the diary before discussing it with a clinician, coach, or dietitian?

Food-log quality checker only. Ojava checks whether a diary has enough reviewed days, portion context, source labels, and user goals to support a better conversation. It does not prescribe calories, macros, foods, a diet plan, eating-disorder guidance, medical nutrition therapy, diagnosis, treatment, or weight-loss advice.

Scientific references

Dietary Assessment PrimerNational Cancer Institute, 2026.Supports the boundary that self-reported dietary data need clear methods, detail, and careful interpretation. It does not validate Ojava as a diet-quality, diagnosis, or treatment tool.
24-hour dietary recall at a glanceNational Cancer Institute, 2026.Supports capturing foods, beverages, time, source, preparation details, and portion size instead of relying on a food name alone. It does not make Ojava a clinical dietary assessment.
Overview of Dietary Assessment Methods for Measuring Intakes of Foods, Beverages, and Dietary Supplements in Research StudiesCurrent Nutrition Reports, 2021.Supports the evidence boundary that self-reported dietary exposure measurement is difficult and should be interpreted as pattern context. It does not support calorie prescriptions or medical nutrition therapy.

Bring this diary check into Ojava Coach

Use it well

Enter the values or context you already have.
Review the local result before sign-in.
Use the Coach handoff only when you want a deeper record-aware conversation.

The clinical boundary and source basis stay attached to the result, then repeat once at the page close.

Research and source basis

Dietary Assessment PrimerNational Cancer Institute, 2026. Supports the boundary that self-reported dietary data need clear methods, detail, and careful interpretation. It does not validate Ojava as a diet-quality, diagnosis, or treatment tool.
24-hour dietary recall at a glanceNational Cancer Institute, 2026. Supports capturing foods, beverages, time, source, preparation details, and portion size instead of relying on a food name alone. It does not make Ojava a clinical dietary assessment.
Overview of Dietary Assessment Methods for Measuring Intakes of Foods, Beverages, and Dietary Supplements in Research StudiesCurrent Nutrition Reports, 2021. Supports the evidence boundary that self-reported dietary exposure measurement is difficult and should be interpreted as pattern context. It does not support calorie prescriptions or medical nutrition therapy.

Back to all free tools

These tools are education and visit prep only. They do not diagnose, prescribe, order labs, determine screening eligibility, clear medication safety, detect conditions, triage emergencies, or replace your clinician.

What Ojava keeps clear

A calm place to understand the pattern before your next step

Ojava organizes health records, wearable trends, medication context, and visit prep in one view. It explains what signals generally mean and keeps clinician decisions where they belong.

Start with your records Read the guides

How the pieces sit togetherThree principles

Your data stays contextual

Daily signals, accepted records, and notes are reviewed together so one lab, symptom, or wearable trend is not treated as an isolated clue.

Education before action

Ojava prepares questions and context. It does not diagnose, prescribe, dose, order labs, or replace licensed care.

One record, many moments

The same structure supports a morning check, a new lab review, and a visit packet when you need it.